On 11/30/2012 2:01 PM, Eric Paris wrote:
> Do other LSMs need this too Casey? I remember we mentioned how select
> was dangerous :-(
I don't see any missing dependencies, but then, I missed INET.
Yes, you mentioned that it was dangerous.
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Casey Schaufler
>
Do other LSMs need this too Casey? I remember we mentioned how select
was dangerous :-(
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Casey Schaufler
wrote:
> Because NETLABEL depends on INET SECURITY_SMACK
> has to explicitly call out the dependency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler
> ---
> security/s
On 11/30/2012 10:43 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap
> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:40:09 -0800
>
>> On 11/30/2012 09:28 AM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>>
>>> Because NETLABEL depends on INET SECURITY_SMACK
>>> has to explicitly call out the dependency.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler
On Friday, November 30, 2012 09:40:09 AM Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 11/30/2012 09:28 AM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> > Because NETLABEL depends on INET SECURITY_SMACK
> > has to explicitly call out the dependency.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler
>
> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap
>
> Thanks for the
From: Randy Dunlap
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:40:09 -0800
> On 11/30/2012 09:28 AM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>
>> Because NETLABEL depends on INET SECURITY_SMACK
>> has to explicitly call out the dependency.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler
>
>
> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap
>
> Thanks for the
On 11/30/2012 09:28 AM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> Because NETLABEL depends on INET SECURITY_SMACK
> has to explicitly call out the dependency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap
Thanks for the quick fix.
> ---
> security/smack/Kconfig |1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 ins
6 matches
Mail list logo
