Re: [PATCH] Serial 8250: Handle saving the clear-on-read bits from the LSR and MSR

2007-07-06 Thread Alan Cox
> > Testing for some time in -mm in case of side effects and then pushing it > > to an early -rc of a new kernel > > > I just pulled 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 and I looked in all the previous 2.6.22 mm > patches and I don't see it. Am I missing something? Getting it submitted into -mm as a starting poin

Re: [PATCH] Serial 8250: Handle saving the clear-on-read bits from the LSR and MSR

2007-07-06 Thread Corey Minyard
Alan Cox wrote: On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 14:42:44 -0500 Corey Minyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I haven't heard anything on this patch. This is moved up to 2.6.22-rc7. Is there anything that needs to change to get it included? Testing for some time in -mm in case of side effects and then

Re: [PATCH] Serial 8250: Handle saving the clear-on-read bits from the LSR and MSR

2007-07-06 Thread Alan Cox
On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 14:42:44 -0500 Corey Minyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I haven't heard anything on this patch. This is moved up to 2.6.22-rc7. > Is there anything that needs to change to get it included? Testing for some time in -mm in case of side effects and then pushing it to an early

Re: [PATCH] Serial 8250: Handle saving the clear-on-read bits from the LSR and MSR

2007-05-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 16 May 2007, Corey Minyard wrote: >Russell King wrote: >> On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 12:58:25PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: >>> [long message snipped] >>> >>> Thanks for your patience Corey. >> >> So, in one sentence or preferably one word, did Corey's patch cause a >> regression? > >>From

Re: [PATCH] Serial 8250: Handle saving the clear-on-read bits from the LSR and MSR

2007-05-16 Thread Corey Minyard
Russell King wrote: > On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 12:58:25PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > >> [long message snipped] >> >> Thanks for your patience Corey. >> > > So, in one sentence or preferably one word, did Corey's patch cause a > regression? > >From what Gene said, I think the final outco

Re: [PATCH] Serial 8250: Handle saving the clear-on-read bits from the LSR and MSR

2007-05-06 Thread Russell King
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 12:58:25PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > [long message snipped] > > Thanks for your patience Corey. So, in one sentence or preferably one word, did Corey's patch cause a regression? -- Russell King Linux kernel2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer

Re: [PATCH] Serial 8250: Handle saving the clear-on-read bits from the LSR and MSR

2007-05-06 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 04 May 2007, Corey Minyard wrote: >Gene Heskett wrote: >> On Friday 04 May 2007, Corey Minyard wrote: >>> I did think of one other thing: if you clear the MSR delta flags while >>> polling the serial console, you need to call the routine to check the >>> modem status since the interrupt w

Re: [PATCH] Serial 8250: Handle saving the clear-on-read bits from the LSR and MSR

2007-05-04 Thread Corey Minyard
Gene Heskett wrote: On Friday 04 May 2007, Corey Minyard wrote: I did think of one other thing: if you clear the MSR delta flags while polling the serial console, you need to call the routine to check the modem status since the interrupt will not happen. So here's the patch... Subject: Seri

Re: [PATCH] Serial 8250: Handle saving the clear-on-read bits from the LSR and MSR

2007-05-04 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 04 May 2007, Corey Minyard wrote: >I did think of one other thing: if you clear the MSR delta flags while >polling the serial console, you need to call the routine to check the >modem status since the interrupt will not happen. So here's the >patch... > >Subject: Serial 8250: Handle savi

Re: [PATCH] Serial 8250: Handle saving the clear-on-read bits from the LSR and MSR

2007-05-02 Thread Russell King
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 09:29:00AM -0500, Corey Minyard wrote: > I didn't hear back, so I went ahead and did a patch. You haven't heard back because I've not had a chance (and still haven't) to look at the various data sheets I've accumulated. I'll be catching up with anything not requiring a simp