Re: [PATCH] Remove a few UMSDOS leftovers

2007-05-24 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Jesper Juhl wrote: > Ok, that makes sense. How about this version : Could you document which numbers were actually used by umsdos, instead of reserving a full block of 256? Since it's dead, it's not going to eat any more numbers. -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsu

Re: [PATCH] Remove a few UMSDOS leftovers

2007-05-24 Thread Jesper Juhl
On 25/05/07, H. Peter Anvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jesper Juhl wrote: > Ok, that makes sense. How about this version : Could you document which numbers were actually used by umsdos, instead of reserving a full block of 256? Since it's dead, it's not going to eat any more numbers. Sure, I'

Re: [PATCH] Remove a few UMSDOS leftovers

2007-05-24 Thread Jesper Juhl
On Friday 25 May 2007 01:07:17 H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Jesper Juhl wrote: > > The UMSDOS filesystem was removed back in 2.6.11, but some tiny bits > > stuck around. This patch removes the few leftovers. > > The only things left behind after this are the entries in the CREDITS file. > > > > Signed

Re: [PATCH] Remove a few UMSDOS leftovers

2007-05-24 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Jesper Juhl wrote: > The UMSDOS filesystem was removed back in 2.6.11, but some tiny bits > stuck around. This patch removes the few leftovers. > The only things left behind after this are the entries in the CREDITS file. > > Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > > Documentati