On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 12:44:19PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Using QEMU is far less complex than the patch you wrote, the tricky
> point me be to find an ARMv6 root filesystem, unless you build the
> module into the kernel and let it run its tests.
I beg to differ - when I tried qemu during
On 05/25/2017 01:08 PM, Shubham Bansal wrote:
> Hi Florian,
>
> It would be great if you could help me with it.
>
> Currently, what I am doing is.
>
> root@arm$ ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf- make -j4
>
> Then I am using Busybox to build the root filesystem
>
> root@arm$ qemu-sys
For what it's worth, I did an comparison of the numbers Shubham posted
in another thread for the JIT, comparing the eBPF interpreter with his
new JIT. The post is here:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg436402.html
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Hi Florian,
It would be great if you could help me with it.
Currently, what I am doing is.
root@arm$ ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf- make -j4
Then I am using Busybox to build the root filesystem
root@arm$ qemu-system-arm -M vexpress-a9 -dtb
./linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-c
On 05/25/2017 12:09 PM, Shubham Bansal wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:18 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:05:23AM +0530, Shubham Bansal wrote:
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>> My Apologies.
>>>
>>> I will remove the #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN. Do you have the
>>
Hi Andrew,
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:18 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:05:23AM +0530, Shubham Bansal wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> My Apologies.
>>
>> I will remove the #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN. Do you have the
>> ARMv6 machine you can test it on?
>
> Sorry, i don't have
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:05:23AM +0530, Shubham Bansal wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> My Apologies.
>
> I will remove the #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN. Do you have the
> ARMv6 machine you can test it on?
Sorry, i don't have a v6.
Maybe try kzm with qemu-system-qemu?
Andrew
Hi Andrew,
My Apologies.
I will remove the #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN. Do you have the
ARMv6 machine you can test it on?
-Shubham
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:30:36PM +0530, Shubham Bansal wrote:
> Actually I intentionally put that print statement their.
Hi Shubham
Please don't top post.
> Can you tell me what ifdef you removed ?
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN
Since i said, ARM does not seem to use it.
Andrew
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 07:00:51PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 02:01:36AM +0530, Shubham Bansal wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > I am attaching the latest patch which should work on ARMv5 , ARMv6 and
> > ARMv7.
> >
> > Please test on your machines. Apologies for the last pat
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 02:01:36AM +0530, Shubham Bansal wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I am attaching the latest patch which should work on ARMv5 , ARMv6 and ARMv7.
>
> Please test on your machines. Apologies for the last patch. This patch
> should work though.
andrew@shuttle:~/linux$ make -s -j 16
ar
Hi Andrew,
Did you get the chance to test the patch?
Best,
Shubham Bansal
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 2:01 AM, Shubham Bansal
wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I am attaching the latest patch which should work on ARMv5 , ARMv6 and ARMv7.
>
> Please test on your machines. Apologies for the last patch. This pa
Hi Andrew,
I am attaching the latest patch which should work on ARMv5 , ARMv6 and ARMv7.
Please test on your machines. Apologies for the last patch. This patch
should work though.
Best,
Shubham Bansal
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 4:55 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> root@qnap:~# test_bpf: #0 TAX jited:0
root@qnap:~# test_bpf: #0 TAX jited:0 241 466 241 PASS
test_bpf: #1 TXA jited:1 51 117 51 PASS
test_bpf: #2 ADD_SUB_MUL_K jited:0 167 PASS
test_bpf: #3 DIV_MOD_KX jited:0 571 PASS
test_bpf: #4 AND_OR_LSH_K jited:1 54 54 PASS
test_bpf: #5 LD_IMM_0 jited:1 45 PASS
test_bpf: #6 LD_IND jited:0 143 143
Hi Andrew,
I am attaching the additional patch to make it work for ARMv5 as well.
Let me know if you find any issues with this.
Please apply 0002-Editted-for-ARMv5-compilation.patch after applying
the first patch.
Best,
Shubham Bansal
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On We
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:03:53AM +0530, Shubham Bansal wrote:
> The JIT compiler emits ARM 32 bit instructions. Currently, It supports
> eBPF only. Classic BPF is supported because of the conversion by BPF
> core.
>
> JIT is enabled with
>
> echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
>
>
Hi Andrew,
I think I forgot to compile it for ARMv5. Let me send the patch again
in few minutes.
I appreciate the help.
Best,
Shubham Bansal
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:03:53AM +0530, Shubham Bansal wrote:
>> The JIT compiler emits ARM 32 bi
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:03:53AM +0530, Shubham Bansal wrote:
> The JIT compiler emits ARM 32 bit instructions. Currently, It supports
> eBPF only. Classic BPF is supported because of the conversion by BPF
> core.
make mvebu_v5_defconfig
make -s -j 16
arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c: In function emit
Hi Russell,
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:03:53AM +0530, Shubham Bansal wrote:
>> The JIT compiler emits ARM 32 bit instructions. Currently, It supports
>> eBPF only. Classic BPF is supported because of the conversion by BPF
Hi,
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:03:53AM +0530, Shubham Bansal wrote:
> The JIT compiler emits ARM 32 bit instructions. Currently, It supports
> eBPF only. Classic BPF is supported because of the conversion by BPF
> core.
>
> JIT is enabled with
>
> echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
20 matches
Mail list logo
