Re: [PATCH] Prevent going idle with softirq pending

2007-05-21 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [ 550.280860] BUG: at kernel/softirq.c:138 local_bh_enable() yep. The correct patch is the one below. Ingo -> Subject: Prevent going idle with softirq pending From: Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The NOHZ patch co

Re: [PATCH] Prevent going idle with softirq pending

2007-05-21 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 21 May 2007 23:34:24 +0200 Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The NOHZ patch contains a check for softirqs pending when a CPU goes > idle. The BUG is unrelated to NOHZ, it just was made visible by the NOHZ > patch. The BUG showed up mainly on P4 / hyperthreading enabled machines

Re: [PATCH] Prevent going idle with softirq pending

2007-05-21 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The NOHZ patch contains a check for softirqs pending when a CPU goes > idle. The BUG is unrelated to NOHZ, it just was made visible by the > NOHZ patch. The BUG showed up mainly on P4 / hyperthreading enabled > machines which lead the investigatio