Hi Matt, All,
> The drawback is mostly in getting the rejection/moderation message.
>
> Whitelisting is fine. If you configure the list to not send the
> moderation warning to legitimate non-subscribers, you'll eliminate 99%
> of the annoyance.
Good call, have changed the configuration according
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 07:58:13AM +1000, Hugh Blemings wrote:
> Hi Geoff,
>
> > Could you verify that cbe-oss-dev is a subscriber's
> > only list? I didn't see anything that said it
> > specifically in the listinfo.
>
> Yes, the list is configured as subscriber only, I make sure I add people to
Hi Geoff,
> Could you verify that cbe-oss-dev is a subscriber's
> only list? I didn't see anything that said it
> specifically in the listinfo.
Yes, the list is configured as subscriber only, I make sure I add people to the
accept filter as soon as they hit the list.
Fell behind a bit yesterd
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 02:18 +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> That's precisely a subscribers-only list. At least as per MAINTAINER's
> definition of that term. It'd be surprising to know of a mailing list
> mentioned in MAINTAINERS that _drops_ messages posted to it entirely!
Here's one possibility, t
On 08/21/2007 10:48 PM, Satyam Sharma wrote:
That means it's not a subcriber-only list -- the message wasn't rejected,
just subjected to moderation.
That's precisely a subscribers-only list. At least as per MAINTAINER's
definition of that term. It'd be surprising to know of a mailing list
ment
On 08/21/2007 10:17 PM, Geoff Levand wrote:
Rene Herman wrote:
On 08/21/2007 10:01 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
The reason it is being held:
Post by non-member to a members-only list
That means it's not a subcriber-only list -- the message wasn't rejected,
just subjected to moderation.
S
Hi,
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Geoff Levand wrote:
> Rene Herman wrote:
> > On 08/21/2007 10:01 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 12:01 -0700, Geoff Levand wrote:
> >
> >>> Could you verify that cbe-oss-dev is a subscriber's
> >>> only list? I didn't see anything that said it
>
Rene Herman wrote:
> On 08/21/2007 10:01 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 12:01 -0700, Geoff Levand wrote:
>
>>> Could you verify that cbe-oss-dev is a subscriber's
>>> only list? I didn't see anything that said it
>>> specifically in the listinfo.
>>
>> This is the "hold" mess
On 08/21/2007 10:01 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 12:01 -0700, Geoff Levand wrote:
Could you verify that cbe-oss-dev is a subscriber's
only list? I didn't see anything that said it
specifically in the listinfo.
This is the "hold" message I got on posting to that list.
Your
Satyam Sharma wrote:
>
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Satyam Sharma wrote:
>> > On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> > >
>> > > [ and you dropped the cell mailing list from the CC list ]
>> >
>> > I don't enjoy getting "this is a subscrib
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 12:01 -0700, Geoff Levand wrote:
> Could you verify that cbe-oss-dev is a subscriber's
> only list? I didn't see anything that said it
> specifically in the listinfo.
This is the "hold" message I got on posting to that list.
Your mail to 'cbe-oss-dev' with the subject
Satyam Sharma wrote:
>
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Satyam Sharma wrote:
>> > On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> > >
>> > > [ and you dropped the cell mailing list from the CC list ]
>> >
>> > I don't enjoy getting "this is a subscrib
12 matches
Mail list logo
