On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2016 02:36:26 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
>
>> > OK, applied, but let Steven and the x86 folks see it.
>
> The below patch looks fine to me. Anything else I should look at?
No, that was it, thanks!
On Thu, 3 Mar 2016 02:36:26 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
> > OK, applied, but let Steven and the x86 folks see it.
The below patch looks fine to me. Anything else I should look at?
-- Steve
> >
> >>>
> >>> > ---
> >>> > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c | 7 +++
> >>> > 1 file changed,
Well, fix up the Steven's address.
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:34 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Todd Brandt
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 01:19 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 1:05 AM, Todd Brandt
>>> wrote:
>>> > Pause/unpause graph
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Todd Brandt
wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 01:19 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 1:05 AM, Todd Brandt
>> wrote:
>> > Pause/unpause graph tracing around do_suspend_lowlevel as it has
>> > inconsistent call/return info after it jumps to the
4 matches
Mail list logo