Re: [PATCH] PCI: Intel 10G NIC ACS quirks

2014-09-29 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
gt; To: Alex Williamson > Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Ronciak, John > Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Intel 10G NIC ACS quirks > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 05:07:59PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: >> Intel has verified there is no peer-to-peer between fu

RE: [PATCH] PCI: Intel 10G NIC ACS quirks

2014-09-29 Thread Ronciak, John
d for it, here it is. Cheers, John -Original Message- From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:bhelg...@google.com] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 12:49 PM To: Alex Williamson Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Ronciak, John Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Intel 10G NIC ACS quirk

Re: [PATCH] PCI: Intel 10G NIC ACS quirks

2014-09-29 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 05:07:59PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > Intel has verified there is no peer-to-peer between functions for the > below selection of 82598, 82599, and X520 10G NICs. These NICs lack > an ACS capability, so we're not able to determine this isolation > without the help of qu