On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> Should not be dangerous, just second try.
>
> I still don't understand this. Why do we set "res->flags = 0"? That
> clears out the resource type. Where do we figure out the type of "res"
> again?
pci_bridge_check_ranges()
>> Subject: [P
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:41:02PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Andreas Noever
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > It seems to fix the testcase (no unwanted resources are released). But
> > why do you reassign bus and not just skip th
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Andreas Noever
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> It seems to fix the testcase (no unwanted resources are released). But
> why do you reassign bus and not just skip the top level bridge? If one
> of the allocations below bridge failed th
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> [+cc Yinghai]
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 10:45:30PM +0200, Andreas Noever wrote:
>>> The problem can be reproduced by having two sibling hotplug bridges A
>>> and B. The problem will o
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Yinghai]
>
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 10:45:30PM +0200, Andreas Noever wrote:
>> The problem can be reproduced by having two sibling hotplug bridges A
>> and B. The problem will occour if the parent of A and B does not have
>> enough reso
[+cc Yinghai]
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 10:45:30PM +0200, Andreas Noever wrote:
> pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources is used to assign resources below
> a hotplug bridge. If the first attempt fails it will release some
> resources and try again. If a resource allocation on the hotplug bridge
> i
6 matches
Mail list logo
