Re: [PATCH] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending with tickless plip

2007-05-19 Thread David Miller
From: Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 12:52:11 +0200 > On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 15:00 +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > Hi > > > > On one of my machines with tickless kernel and plip I get messages : > > I bet this is a machine a P4 with Hyperthreading enabled ? > > > NO

Re: [PATCH] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending with tickless plip

2007-05-17 Thread David Miller
From: Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 12:52:11 +0200 > On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 15:00 +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > Hi > > > > On one of my machines with tickless kernel and plip I get messages : > > I bet this is a machine a P4 with Hyperthreading enabled ? > > > NO

Re: [PATCH] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending with tickless plip

2007-05-17 Thread Mikulas Patocka
Hi On one of my machines with tickless kernel and plip I get messages : I bet this is a machine a P4 with Hyperthreading enabled ? No, it's single Pentium 2. I have other Pentium MMX using plip, where I don't get these error messages, I don't know why. Mikulas NOHZ: local_softirq_pending

Re: [PATCH] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending with tickless plip

2007-05-17 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 15:00 +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > Hi > > On one of my machines with tickless kernel and plip I get messages : I bet this is a machine a P4 with Hyperthreading enabled ? > NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08 > > always when using plip (on other machine with tickless kernel a