It seems that the subject patch generates a warning (missed it on the
compile). Here is a patch to eliminate the warning.
--
George Anzinger george@mvista.com
HRT (High-res-timers): http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
Source: MontaVista Software, Inc. George Anzinger
Type: Defect
Keith Owens wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:55:23 -0700,
George Anzinger wrote:
This patch adds a notify to the die_nmi notify that the system
is about to be taken down. If the notify is handled with a
NOTIFY_STOP return, the system is given a new lease on life.
void d
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:55:23 -0700,
George Anzinger wrote:
> This patch adds a notify to the die_nmi notify that the system
> is about to be taken down. If the notify is handled with a
> NOTIFY_STOP return, the system is given a new lease on life.
>
> void die_nmi (struct pt_r
Andrew Morton wrote:
Keith Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I had though that too, but it does not allow recovery (i.e. lets reset
>the watchdog and try again).
die_nmi() returns to nmi_watchdog_tick(), nmi_watchdog_tick does the
reset and continues. Patch below.
>Hmm.. just looked at trap
Keith Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I had though that too, but it does not allow recovery (i.e. lets reset
> >the watchdog and try again).
>
> die_nmi() returns to nmi_watchdog_tick(), nmi_watchdog_tick does the
> reset and continues. Patch below.
>
> >Hmm.. just looked at traps.c.
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:16:56 -0700,
George Anzinger wrote:
>Keith Owens wrote:
>> On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:31:58 -0700,
>> George Anzinger wrote:
>>
>>>I have been doing some work on kgdb to pull a few of it "fingers" out of
>>>various places in the kernel. This is the final location where we
Keith Owens wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:31:58 -0700,
George Anzinger wrote:
I have been doing some work on kgdb to pull a few of it "fingers" out of
various places in the kernel. This is the final location where we have
a kgdb intercept not covered by a notify.
I like the idea, but the
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:31:58 -0700,
George Anzinger wrote:
>I have been doing some work on kgdb to pull a few of it "fingers" out of
>various places in the kernel. This is the final location where we have
>a kgdb intercept not covered by a notify.
I like the idea, but the hook should be in di
George Anzinger wrote:
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > George Anzinger wrote:
> >
> >>This patch adds a notify to the nmi watchdog to notify that
> >>the system is about to be taken down by the watchdog. If the
> >>notify is handled with a NOTIFY_STOP return, the system is
> >>give
Andrew Morton wrote:
George Anzinger wrote:
This patch adds a notify to the nmi watchdog to notify that
the system is about to be taken down by the watchdog. If the
notify is handled with a NOTIFY_STOP return, the system is
given a new lease on life.
It look
George Anzinger wrote:
>
> This patch adds a notify to the nmi watchdog to notify that
> the system is about to be taken down by the watchdog. If the
> notify is handled with a NOTIFY_STOP return, the system is
> given a new lease on life.
It looks sensible, but as there
11 matches
Mail list logo
