Re: [PATCH] Memory Resource Controller Add Boot Option

Paul Menage wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 7:01 PM, Li Zefan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > - foo doesn't show up in /proc/cgroups >> >> Or we can print out the disable flag, maybe this will be better? >> Because we can distinguish from disabled and not compiled in from >> >> /proc/cgro

Re: [PATCH] Memory Resource Controller Add Boot Option

On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 7:01 PM, Li Zefan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > - foo doesn't show up in /proc/cgroups > > Or we can print out the disable flag, maybe this will be better? > Because we can distinguish from disabled and not compiled in from > > /proc/cgroups. Certainly possible, if

Re: [PATCH] Memory Resource Controller Add Boot Option

Hi, > >>> I'll send out a prototype for comment. > > > > Something like the patch below. The effects of cgroup_disable=foo are: > > > > - foo doesn't show up in /proc/cgroups > > Or we can print out the disable flag, maybe this will be better? > Because we can distinguish from disabled and not

Re: [PATCH] Memory Resource Controller Add Boot Option

Paul Menage wrote: >>> I'll send out a prototype for comment. > > Something like the patch below. The effects of cgroup_disable=foo are: > > - foo doesn't show up in /proc/cgroups Or we can print out the disable flag, maybe this will be better? Because we can distinguish from disabled and not co

Re: [PATCH] Memory Resource Controller Add Boot Option

I'll send out a prototype for comment. Something like the patch below. The effects of cgroup_disable=foo are: - foo doesn't show up in /proc/cgroups - foo isn't auto-mounted if you mount all cgroups in a single hierarchy - foo isn't visible as an individually mountable subsystem As a result th

Re: [PATCH] Memory Resource Controller Add Boot Option

Paul Menage wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I thought about it, but it did not work out all that well. The reason being, >> that the memory controller is called in from places besides cgroup. >> mem_cgroup_charge_common() for example is called

Re: [PATCH] Memory Resource Controller Add Boot Option

On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I thought about it, but it did not work out all that well. The reason being, > that the memory controller is called in from places besides cgroup. > mem_cgroup_charge_common() for example is called from several places i

Re: [PATCH] Memory Resource Controller Add Boot Option

Paul Menage wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 3:55 AM, Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> A boot option for the memory controller was discussed on lkml. It is a good >> idea to add it, since it saves memory for people who want to turn off the >> memory controller. >> >> By default the

Re: [PATCH] Memory Resource Controller Add Boot Option

On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 3:55 AM, Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > A boot option for the memory controller was discussed on lkml. It is a good > idea to add it, since it saves memory for people who want to turn off the > memory controller. > > By default the option is on for the fol