On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:30:09PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 22:10 +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > "make headers_check" is too verbose. It likes to chat even if it has
> > just _successfully_ checked a header, and not just on seeing errors.
> > What is worse, even if you
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 22:10 +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > "make headers_check" is too verbose. It likes to chat even if it has
> > just _successfully_ checked a header, and not just on seeing errors.
> > What is worse, even if you touch just one li
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 22:10 +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> "make headers_check" is too verbose. It likes to chat even if it has
> just _successfully_ checked a header, and not just on seeing errors.
> What is worse, even if you touch just one little header in some corner
> (or possibly none) and typ
3 matches
Mail list logo