Re: [PATCH] Inhibit NMI watchdog when Alt-SysRq-T operation is underway.

2007-07-20 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 07:18:23 -0400 Konrad Rzeszutek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I tested your patch along with mine and found two things out: > > 1). Missing this patch (for i386 platform) > > diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c b/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c > index 90da057..9f3a7ff 100644 > --

Re: [PATCH] Inhibit NMI watchdog when Alt-SysRq-T operation is underway.

2007-07-20 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek
Hey Andrew, I tested your patch along with mine and found two things out: 1). Missing this patch (for i386 platform) diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c b/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c index 90da057..9f3a7ff 100644 --- a/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c @@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ s

Re: [PATCH] Inhibit NMI watchdog when Alt-SysRq-T operation is underway.

2007-07-13 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 11:53:02 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > static void print_trace_address(void *data, unsigned long addr) > { > + static int i = 0; > + if (i && ((i % 8) == 0)) > + touch_nmi_watchdog(); > + i++; > printk_address(addr); > } I dou

Re: [PATCH] Inhibit NMI watchdog when Alt-SysRq-T operation is underway.

2007-07-09 Thread darnok
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 10:02:42AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek wrote: > On large memory configuration with not so fast CPUs the NMI watchdog > is triggered when memory addresses are being gathered and printed. > The code paths for Alt-SysRq-t are sprinkled with touch_nmi_watchdog > in various places