On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 11:26:31 -0700 Geoff Levand wrote:
| This patch makes posix_bump_timer() consistent with common convention
| by expecting a pointer to the structure be passed.
|
| Please apply.
Does it matter other than for consistency?
E.g., in a large system with thousands of timers, it
randy_dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 11:26:31 -0700 Geoff Levand wrote:
>
> | This patch makes posix_bump_timer() consistent with common convention
> | by expecting a pointer to the structure be passed.
> |
> | Please apply.
>
> Does it matter other than for consistency?
>
> E.g., in a la
2 matches
Mail list logo
