Bill Irwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 04:03:17PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> I think the right answer is most likely to add an extra file method or
>> two so we can remove the need for is_file_hugepages.
>> There are still 4 calls to is_file_hugepages in ipc/shm.c
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 05:26:48PM -0600, Adam Litke wrote:
> :) Enter my remove-is_file_hugepages() patches (which I posted a few
> weeks ago). I'll rework them and repost soon. That should help to make
> all of this cleaner.
Those were great. I've wanted something like them for a long, long ti
Bill Irwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> A comment to prepare others for the impending doubletake might be nice.
>> Or maybe just open-coding the equality check for &hugetlbfs_file_operations
>> in is_file_shm_hugepages() if others find it as jarring as I. Please
>> extend my ack to any follow-up
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 16:03 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Bill Irwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 03:46:08PM -0800, Adam Litke wrote:
> >> static inline int is_file_hugepages(struct file *file)
> >> {
> >> - return file->f_op == &hugetlbfs_file_operations;
> >>
Bill Irwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 03:46:08PM -0800, Adam Litke wrote:
>> static inline int is_file_hugepages(struct file *file)
>> {
>> -return file->f_op == &hugetlbfs_file_operations;
>> +if (file->f_op == &hugetlbfs_file_operations)
>> +retur
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 03:46:08PM -0800, Adam Litke wrote:
> static inline int is_file_hugepages(struct file *file)
> {
> - return file->f_op == &hugetlbfs_file_operations;
> + if (file->f_op == &hugetlbfs_file_operations)
> + return 1;
> + if (is_file_shm_hugepages(file)
6 matches
Mail list logo
