Re: [PATCH] Don't mark shared helper functions as inline

2013-01-11 Thread Mike Turquette
Quoting Russ Dill (2012-11-27 09:52:50) > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Mike Turquette wrote: > > > > Quoting Russ Dill (2012-11-26 11:20:09) > > > The helper functions that access the opaque struct clk should > > > not be marked inline since they are contained in clk.c, but expected > > > to

Re: [PATCH] Don't mark shared helper functions as inline

2012-11-27 Thread Russ Dill
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Mike Turquette wrote: > > Quoting Russ Dill (2012-11-26 11:20:09) > > The helper functions that access the opaque struct clk should > > not be marked inline since they are contained in clk.c, but expected > > to be used by other compilation units. This causes comp

Re: [PATCH] Don't mark shared helper functions as inline

2012-11-26 Thread Mark A. Greer
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:57:42AM -0800, Mike Turquette wrote: > Quoting Russ Dill (2012-11-26 11:20:09) > > The helper functions that access the opaque struct clk should > > not be marked inline since they are contained in clk.c, but expected > > to be used by other compilation units. This causes

Re: [PATCH] Don't mark shared helper functions as inline

2012-11-26 Thread Mike Turquette
Quoting Russ Dill (2012-11-26 11:20:09) > The helper functions that access the opaque struct clk should > not be marked inline since they are contained in clk.c, but expected > to be used by other compilation units. This causes compile errors > under gcc-4.7 > > In file included from arch/arm/mach