Re: [PATCH] Define smp_call_function_mask() on uniprocessor builds

2007-10-24 Thread Avi Kivity
Andrew Morton wrote: On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:51:25 +0200 Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Rather than #ifdef users of smp_call_function_mask(), define it as an empty macro to avoid build errors. The function explicitly prohibits callers from specifying the current cpu, so nothing needs

Re: [PATCH] Define smp_call_function_mask() on uniprocessor builds

2007-10-24 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:51:25 +0200 Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rather than #ifdef users of smp_call_function_mask(), define it as an > empty macro to avoid build errors. The function explicitly prohibits > callers from specifying the current cpu, so nothing needs to be done. > > This