On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 04:58:17PM +, Ben Dooks wrote:
>
> As the person who did the updates to Sacha's
> original driver port, he should have really checked
> with me for up-to-date version first, and to collect
> a Signed-off-by: line.
>
Sorry, Ben. Of course I should have asked you first,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 04:21:30PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Gwe, 2005-03-18 at 13:31, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > This patch adds support for the davicom dm9000 network driver. The
> > dm9000 is found on some embedded arm boards such as the pimx1 or the
> > scb9328.
>
> Unless I
On Gwe, 2005-03-18 at 13:31, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> This patch adds support for the davicom dm9000 network driver. The
> dm9000 is found on some embedded arm boards such as the pimx1 or the
> scb9328.
Unless I'm missing something its just yet another NE2000 (ie 8390) clone
and can u
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 08:41:52PM +0530, Hong Kong Phoey wrote:
Sacrificing readibility a little bit, you could do something useful.
Instead of those ugly switch statements you could define function
pointer arrays and call appropriate function
switch(fo
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:25:54 -0500, Lennart Sorensen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 08:41:52PM +0530, Hong Kong Phoey wrote:
> > Sacrificing readibility a little bit, you could do something useful.
> > Instead of those ugly switch statements you could define function
> > point
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 10:25:54AM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 08:41:52PM +0530, Hong Kong Phoey wrote:
> > switch(foo) {
> >
> > case 1:
> > f1();
> > case2 :
> > f2();
> > };
> >
> > could well become
> >
> > void (*func)[] = { f1, f2
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 08:41:52PM +0530, Hong Kong Phoey wrote:
> Sacrificing readibility a little bit, you could do something useful.
> Instead of those ugly switch statements you could define function
> pointer arrays and call appropriate function
>
> switch(foo) {
>
> case 1:
>
Sacrificing readibility a little bit, you could do something useful.
Instead of those ugly switch statements you could define function
pointer arrays and call appropriate function
switch(foo) {
case 1:
f1();
case2 :
f2();
};
could well become
void (*func)[] = { f1,
8 matches
Mail list logo
