HI, Pavel,
yes, thanks for the pointer, will include in the future.
Boris.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 2:05 PM Pavel Shilovsky wrote:
>
> Hi Boris,
>
> Are you talking about this patch "[PATCH] Extend cifs acl utilities to
> handle SACLs"?
>
> Just for the future, I am trying to monitor the samba-de
Hi Boris,
Are you talking about this patch "[PATCH] Extend cifs acl utilities to
handle SACLs"?
Just for the future, I am trying to monitor the samba-dev mailing list
but if you would like to get the fastest response to your patches then
please include me directly or at least the linux-cifs maili
Hello, Shyam,
sorry for the delayed reply and thanks for looking at this patch. Yes,
the testing was done using the extended versions of
getcifsacl/setcifsacl (added setting owner and SACL support), the
patch for that posted recently via samba-technical (message ID
<20201120214918.12517-1-pbo...@a
Hi Boris,
At a high level, the changes look good to me. Will go through the
changes in more detail tomorrow morning.
On a related note, we may need more test coverage in this area.
Can you please share your testing output against your changes?
Or even better, if you can contribute some xfstests f
Hello,
I am checking in to see if anyone had a chance to take a look at this
patch. I would appreciate any feedback.
Thanks!
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 5:01 PM Boris Protopopov via samba-technical
wrote:
>
> Add SYSTEM_SECURITY access flag and use with smb2 when opening
> files for getting/setting S
5 matches
Mail list logo
