On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 02:43:27PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12 2014, Mark Brown wrote:
> > If we're worrying about standards conformance type stuff here this is
> > also buggy since it's out of spec to compare pointers that are not part
> > of the same array like this. Castin
On Fri, Dec 12 2014, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 10:53:41PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>
>> if (a->reg != b->reg)
>> return a->reg - b->reg;
>> -if (a->dapm != b->dapm)
>> -return (unsigned long)a->dapm - (unsigned long)b->dapm;
>> +if (a-
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 10:53:41PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> if (a->reg != b->reg)
> return a->reg - b->reg;
> - if (a->dapm != b->dapm)
> - return (unsigned long)a->dapm - (unsigned long)b->dapm;
> + if (a->dapm < b->dapm)
> + return -1;
3 matches
Mail list logo