> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Tested-by: Duncan Sands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Duncan Sands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks again for doing this!
Best wishes,
Duncan.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a messag
On Monday 11 February 2008 12:22:27 Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> Duncan Sands wrote:
> > Hi Pavel,
> >
> >> Oh, I see. You're right - this race is possible... I'll fix that up
> >> if this patch works.
> >
> > it seems to work fine. Thanks again for doing this!
>
> Oh, thanks for testing. What shou
Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
>> Oh, I see. You're right - this race is possible... I'll fix that up
>> if this patch works.
>
> it seems to work fine. Thanks again for doing this!
Oh, thanks for testing. What should I do next to get this into
mainline? Send it to Andrew with you in Cc, or
Hi Pavel,
> Oh, I see. You're right - this race is possible... I'll fix that up
> if this patch works.
it seems to work fine. Thanks again for doing this!
Best wishes,
Duncan.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>
>>> Does the kthread API guarantee that the kthread is not running until you
>>> call
>> It does. That's why the race, you mentioned above is impossible.
>
> That is wrong. The API guarantees only that the kthread is initially
>
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> > Does the kthread API guarantee that the kthread is not running until you
> > call
>
> It does. That's why the race, you mentioned above is impossible.
That is wrong. The API guarantees only that the kthread is initially
created in a non-running s
Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
@@ -1014,11 +1015,7 @@ static int usbatm_do_heavy_init(void *arg)
struct usbatm_data *instance = arg;
int ret;
- daemonize(instance->driver->driver_name);
allow_signal(SIGTERM);
- instance->thread_pid = current->pid;
Hi Pavel,
> >> @@ -1014,11 +1015,7 @@ static int usbatm_do_heavy_init(void *arg)
> >>struct usbatm_data *instance = arg;
> >>int ret;
> >>
> >> - daemonize(instance->driver->driver_name);
> >>allow_signal(SIGTERM);
> >> - instance->thread_pid = current->pid;
> >> -
> >> - complete
Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> The problem is that I couldn't find the maintainer for the code
>> in drivers/usb/atm/.
>
> that would be me (though since I haven't used this modem in years I would
> be more than happy to hand it off to someone else).
>
>> Besides, I don't have a proper hardware
Hi,
> The problem is that I couldn't find the maintainer for the code
> in drivers/usb/atm/.
that would be me (though since I haven't used this modem in years I would
be more than happy to hand it off to someone else).
> Besides, I don't have a proper hardware to test this.
I will try to find
10 matches
Mail list logo
