Re: [PATCH/RFC] kthread API conversion for dvb_frontend and av7110

2007-01-24 Thread Cedric Le Goater
Cedric Le Goater wrote: > Andrew de Quincey wrote: > >> Hi - the conversion looks good to me.. I can't really offer any more >> constructive suggestions beyond what Cedric has already said. > > ok. so, should we just resend a refreshed version of the patch when 2.6.19 > comes out ? > >> Ther

Re: [Devel] Re: [PATCH/RFC] kthread API conversion for dvb_frontend and av7110

2006-12-13 Thread Cedric Le Goater
Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 03:58:16PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> Andrew de Quincey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> [snip] >>> correct, will fix that up in the next round thanks for the feedback, Herbert >>> Hi - the conversion looks good to me.. I

Re: [PATCH/RFC] kthread API conversion for dvb_frontend and av7110

2006-12-12 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 03:58:16PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Andrew de Quincey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > [snip] > > > >> correct, will fix that up in the next round > >> > >> thanks for the feedback, > >> Herbert > > > > Hi - the conversion looks good to me.. I can't really offer a

Re: [PATCH/RFC] kthread API conversion for dvb_frontend and av7110

2006-12-12 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Andrew de Quincey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [snip] > >> correct, will fix that up in the next round >> >> thanks for the feedback, >> Herbert > > Hi - the conversion looks good to me.. I can't really offer any more > constructive suggestions beyond what Cedric has already said. > > Theres an

Re: [PATCH/RFC] kthread API conversion for dvb_frontend and av7110

2006-11-16 Thread Andrew de Quincey
[snip] > correct, will fix that up in the next round > > thanks for the feedback, > Herbert Hi - the conversion looks good to me.. I can't really offer any more constructive suggestions beyond what Cedric has already said. Theres another thread in dvb_ca_en50221.c that could be converted as we