Re: [PATCH, RFC] adjust legacy IDE resource setting

2007-03-07 Thread Petri Kaukasoina
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 03:05:24PM +, Jan Beulich wrote: > The change to force legacy mode IDE channels' resources to fixed > non-zero values confuses (at least some versions of) X, because the > values reported by the kernel and those readable from PCI config space > aren't consistent anymore.

Re: [PATCH, RFC] adjust legacy IDE resource setting

2007-02-14 Thread Alan
> The masking is done primarily to (a) calculate the correct length (from a > BAR's > perspective), as I don't want to write the BAR if its length doesn't match the > expectation, and (b) to properly report the new value in the printk. Ok I guess you have to do something like that since you can't

Re: [PATCH, RFC] adjust legacy IDE resource setting

2007-02-14 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 14.02.07 16:40 >>> >On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:05:24 + >"Jan Beulich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The change to force legacy mode IDE channels' resources to fixed >> non-zero values confuses (at least some versions of) X, because the >> values reported by the kernel

Re: [PATCH, RFC] adjust legacy IDE resource setting

2007-02-14 Thread Alan
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:05:24 + "Jan Beulich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The change to force legacy mode IDE channels' resources to fixed > non-zero values confuses (at least some versions of) X, because the > values reported by the kernel and those readable from PCI config space > aren't con