On Tuesday 12 August 2014 20:45:03 John Stultz wrote:
> On 08/12/2014 06:33 PM, j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 05:08:53PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> >> Also, just to clarify, as time related discussions can bring out a laundry
> >> list of issues, I would like to focus th
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 02:37:11AM +0100, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 6:33 PM, wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 05:08:53PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> >> A more aggressive version of the previous proposal is what I’m calling the
> >> “New Virtual-Architecture” approach, bas
On 08/12/2014 06:33 PM, j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 05:08:53PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
>> Also, just to clarify, as time related discussions can bring out a laundry
>> list of issues, I would like to focus this discussion on providing a 2038
>> solution for existing int
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 6:33 PM, wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 05:08:53PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
>> Also, just to clarify, as time related discussions can bring out a laundry
>> list of issues, I would like to focus this discussion on providing a 2038
>> solution for existing interfaces and
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 05:08:53PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> Also, just to clarify, as time related discussions can bring out a laundry
> list of issues, I would like to focus this discussion on providing a 2038
> solution for existing interfaces and applications in a way that ideally
> doesn't r
5 matches
Mail list logo
