Re: [GIT PULL] UAPI: perf fixes

2012-11-14 Thread Xiao Guangrong
On 11/14/2012 12:34 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:42:02AM -0500, Josh Boyer escreveu: >> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:24 AM, David Howells wrote: >>> Josh Boyer wrote: >>> tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c became x86-only with the following commit: >>> >>> commit b

Re: [GIT PULL] UAPI: perf fixes

2012-11-13 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:42:02AM -0500, Josh Boyer escreveu: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:24 AM, David Howells wrote: > > Josh Boyer wrote: > > tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c became x86-only with the following commit: > > > > commit bcf6edcd6fdb8965290f0b635a530fa3c6c212e1 > > Author:

Re: [GIT PULL] UAPI: perf fixes

2012-11-13 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:24 AM, David Howells wrote: > Josh Boyer wrote: > >> This patch seems to break building perf on ppc64. It fails with: >> >> + make -j16 -C tools/perf -s V=1 WERROR=0 HAVE_CPLUS_DEMANGLE=1 prefix=/usr >> all >> >> >> >> builtin-kvm.c:25:21: fatal error: asm/svm.h: No

Re: [GIT PULL] UAPI: perf fixes

2012-11-13 Thread David Howells
Josh Boyer wrote: > This patch seems to break building perf on ppc64. It fails with: > > + make -j16 -C tools/perf -s V=1 WERROR=0 HAVE_CPLUS_DEMANGLE=1 prefix=/usr > all > > > > builtin-kvm.c:25:21: fatal error: asm/svm.h: No such file or directory tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c became x86-only

Re: [GIT PULL] UAPI: perf fixes

2012-11-13 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 6:12 AM, David Howells wrote: > David Howells wrote: > >> Josh Boyer wrote: >> >> > This patch seems to break building perf on ppc64. It fails with: >> >> Hmmm... Getting my hands on an ARM or ppc/ppc64 box running Fedora is a >> problem, and as far as I know, this need

Re: [GIT PULL] UAPI: perf fixes

2012-11-13 Thread David Howells
David Howells wrote: > Josh Boyer wrote: > > > This patch seems to break building perf on ppc64. It fails with: > > Hmmm... Getting my hands on an ARM or ppc/ppc64 box running Fedora is a > problem, and as far as I know, this needs to be built natively or maybe > cross-compiled with a full e

Re: [GIT PULL] UAPI: perf fixes

2012-11-13 Thread David Howells
Josh Boyer wrote: > This patch seems to break building perf on ppc64. It fails with: Hmmm... Getting my hands on an ARM or ppc/ppc64 box running Fedora is a problem, and as far as I know, this needs to be built natively or maybe cross-compiled with a full environment (including graphics libs).

Re: [GIT PULL] UAPI: perf fixes

2012-11-12 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:51 AM, David Howells wrote: > > (6) Make perf work for x86 by adding -I flags and changing long #includes > with "../../include" in them into short type things. This patch seems to break building perf on ppc64. It fails with: + make -j16 -C tools/perf -s V=1 WERR