Re: [GIT PULL] Disintegrate UAPI for arm64 [ver #2]

2012-10-09 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 08:30:59PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > It still fails on arm64. The reason is that I had a __SYSCALL_COMPAT > > guard to provide either the 32-bit syscalls or the 64-bit (generic) ones > > via asm/unistd.h. With this change: > > Hmmm. > > W

Re: [GIT PULL] Disintegrate UAPI for arm64 [ver #2]

2012-10-09 Thread David Howells
Catalin Marinas wrote: > It still fails on arm64. The reason is that I had a __SYSCALL_COMPAT > guard to provide either the 32-bit syscalls or the 64-bit (generic) ones > via asm/unistd.h. With this change: Hmmm. Why does asm/unistd.h get #included for the compat bits at all? Looking in arch/a

Re: [GIT PULL] Disintegrate UAPI for arm64 [ver #2]

2012-10-09 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:15:13AM +0100, David Howells wrote: > David Howells (1): > UAPI: (Scripted) Disintegrate arch/arm64/include/asm It still fails on arm64. The reason is that I had a __SYSCALL_COMPAT guard to provide either the 32-bit syscalls or the 64-bit (generic) ones via asm/uni

Re: [GIT PULL] Disintegrate UAPI for arm64

2012-10-04 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 08:51:04PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > Can you merge the following branch into the arm64 tree please. > > This is to complete part of the UAPI disintegration for which the preparatory > patches were pulled recently. > > Note that there are some fixup patches which are at