Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-17 Thread Mingming Cao
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 15:29 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote: > On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 17:49 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400 > > > Mingming Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > +static inline __le32 ext4_encode

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-17 Thread Kalpak Shah
On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 17:49 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote: > On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400 > > Mingming Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +static inline __le32 ext4_encode_extra_time(struct timespec *time) > > > +{ > > > + return

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-16 Thread Mingming Cao
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400 > Mingming Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches. > > I don't know what the "old nanosecond patches" are. A link to a suitable > changlog for those pa

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-13 Thread Mingming Cao
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 12:35 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote: > On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 09:59 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > > > > Kalpak Shah wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > >> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400 > > >> Mingming Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-13 Thread Kalpak Shah
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 09:59 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > > Kalpak Shah wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > >> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400 > >> Mingming Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches. > >>

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-12 Thread Aneesh Kumar K.V
Kalpak Shah wrote: On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400 Mingming Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches. I don't know what the "old nanosecond patches" are. A link to a suitable changlog for

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-12 Thread Kalpak Shah
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400 > Mingming Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches. > > I don't know what the "old nanosecond patches" are. A link to a suitable > changlog for those pa

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-11 Thread Andreas Dilger
On Jul 10, 2007 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > +#define EXT4_FITS_IN_INODE(ext4_inode, einode, field) \ > > + ((offsetof(typeof(*ext4_inode), field) +\ > > + sizeof((ext4_inode)->field)) \ > > + <= (EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE + \ > > +

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-11 Thread Andreas Dilger
On Jul 10, 2007 22:00 -0400, Mingming Cao wrote: > On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400 > > Mingming Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches. > > > > I don't know what the "old nanose

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-10 Thread Mingming Cao
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400 > Mingming Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches. > > I don't know what the "old nanosecond patches" are. A link to a suitable > changlog for those pa

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-10 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400 Mingming Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches. I don't know what the "old nanosecond patches" are. A link to a suitable changlog for those patches would do in a pinch. Preferable would be to write a proper chan

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-04 Thread Andreas Dilger
On Jul 04, 2007 12:06 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > Mingming Cao wrote: > >On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 15:58 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote: > >>On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 03:36 -0400, Mingming Cao wrote: > >>>+ > >>>+#define EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME(xtime, inode, raw_inode) \ > >>>+do {

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-04 Thread Aneesh Kumar K.V
Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: Mingming Cao wrote: On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 15:58 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote: On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 03:36 -0400, Mingming Cao wrote: + +#define EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME(xtime, inode, raw_inode) \ +do { \ +(in

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-03 Thread Aneesh Kumar K.V
Mingming Cao wrote: On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 15:58 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote: On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 03:36 -0400, Mingming Cao wrote: + +#define EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME(xtime, inode, raw_inode) \ +do { \

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-03 Thread Mingming Cao
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 15:58 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote: > On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 03:36 -0400, Mingming Cao wrote: > > + > > +#define EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME(xtime, inode, raw_inode) > >\ > > +do { > >

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-03 Thread Kalpak Shah
On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 03:36 -0400, Mingming Cao wrote: > + > +#define EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME(xtime, inode, raw_inode) >\ > +do {\ > + (inode)->xtime.tv_sec = le32_to_cpu((raw_inode)->xtime);

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-03 Thread Kalpak Shah
On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 03:36 -0400, Mingming Cao wrote: > + > +#define EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME(xtime, inode, raw_inode) >\ > +do {\ > + (inode)->xtime.tv_sec = le32_to_cpu((raw_inode)->xtime);

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-02 Thread Aneesh Kumar K.V
Mingming Cao wrote: This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches. It includes some cleanups and addition of a creation timestamp. The EXT3_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_EXTRA_ISIZE flag has also been added along with s Should be EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_EXTRA_ISIZE -aneesh - To unsubscribe from