Re: [Demo program]: Poor elevator performance in 2.4.0-test9pre6

2000-09-27 Thread Matthew Fredrickson
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 04:10:38PM +1000, Robert Cohen wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote > > I doubt this has any relevance whatsoever, but when I try this on a > 2.2.16 > kernel running on top of a Pentium Pro 200 w/96megs of mem w/ a SCSI 2 > disk, I get some funny numbers: > > matt@zeus:~/c

Re: [Demo program]: Poor elevator performance in 2.4.0-test9pre6

2000-09-26 Thread Robert Cohen
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote I doubt this has any relevance whatsoever, but when I try this on a 2.2.16 kernel running on top of a Pentium Pro 200 w/96megs of mem w/ a SCSI 2 disk, I get some funny numbers: matt@zeus:~/cwork/personal$ ./elv_test 8 30 files created, 240 megs written at 4.32 megs/sec

Re: [Demo program]: Poor elevator performance in 2.4.0-test9pre6

2000-09-26 Thread lists
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 04:00:51PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Mon, Sep 25 2000, Robert Cohen wrote: > > With kernel version 2.4.0-test9pre6 the results are as follows. > > The test machine has 128 Megs of memory. The tests accesses 240 Megs of > > files so that it can't fit in cache. > > > > I

Re: [Demo program]: Poor elevator performance in 2.4.0-test9pre6

2000-09-25 Thread Jens Axboe
On Mon, Sep 25 2000, Robert Cohen wrote: > With kernel version 2.4.0-test9pre6 the results are as follows. > The test machine has 128 Megs of memory. The tests accesses 240 Megs of > files so that it can't fit in cache. > > If I run it with 8 files of size 30 Megs: > > [robert@test25 src]$ ./elv