On Wednesday 30 May 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > Is it documented or implied somewhere that ->shutdown must not free
> > the device? If not, the first option is probably the safer choice.
>
> It's not documented anywhere, but implicitly assumed. I don't know
> of any shutdown implementat
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 08:23:49PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sunday 06 May 2007, Geoff Levand wrote:
> > --- ps3-linux-dev.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_base.c
> > +++ ps3-linux-dev/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_base.c
> > @@ -463,8 +463,21 @@ void spu_free(struct spu *spu)
> > }
>
On Sunday 06 May 2007, Geoff Levand wrote:
> --- ps3-linux-dev.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_base.c
> +++ ps3-linux-dev/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_base.c
> @@ -463,8 +463,21 @@ void spu_free(struct spu *spu)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spu_free);
>
> +static int spu_shutdown(struct sys_de
3 matches
Mail list logo
