Hi Paolo,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 04:50:06PM +0200, Nadav Amit wrote:
[...]
>I am just worried that Wanpeng reported it fails, while I report it works...
I just get a real skylake-client machine on hand, both the two patches from
you can run normally, it seems that the silly emulator which I used
On 26/11/2014 02:24, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> Hi all,
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 04:50:06PM +0200, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 25, 2014, at 16:17, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 25/11/2014 15:05, Nadav Amit wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 373b
Hi Nadav,
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:00:34AM +0200, Nadav Amit wrote:
>Wanpeng Li wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 04:50:06PM +0200, Nadav Amit wrote:
On Nov 25, 2014, at 16:17, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 25/11/2014 15:05, Nadav Amit wrote:
>> diff --git
Wanpeng Li wrote:
> Hi all,
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 04:50:06PM +0200, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>> On Nov 25, 2014, at 16:17, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 25/11/2014 15:05, Nadav Amit wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 373b0ab9a32e..ca26681455c
Hi all,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 04:50:06PM +0200, Nadav Amit wrote:
>
>> On Nov 25, 2014, at 16:17, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 25/11/2014 15:05, Nadav Amit wrote:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 373b0ab9a32e..ca26681455c2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/
> On Nov 25, 2014, at 16:17, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
>
> On 25/11/2014 15:05, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>> index 373b0ab9a32e..ca26681455c2 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>> @@ -6955,6 +6955,9 @@ int fx_init(
On 25/11/2014 15:05, Nadav Amit wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > index 373b0ab9a32e..ca26681455c2 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > @@ -6955,6 +6955,9 @@ int fx_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > return err;
> >
> >
> On Nov 25, 2014, at 12:36, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
>
> On 25/11/2014 11:13, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> Hi Paolo,
>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 05:43:32PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> The first patch ensures that XSAVES is not exposed in the guest until
>>> we emulate MSR_IA32_XSS. The second exp
On 25/11/2014 11:13, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 05:43:32PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> The first patch ensures that XSAVES is not exposed in the guest until
>> we emulate MSR_IA32_XSS. The second exports XSAVE data in the correct
>> format.
>>
>> I tested these on
Hi Paolo,
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 05:43:32PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>The first patch ensures that XSAVES is not exposed in the guest until
>we emulate MSR_IA32_XSS. The second exports XSAVE data in the correct
>format.
>
>I tested these on a non-XSAVES system so they should not be completely
10 matches
Mail list logo