On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 09:54 -0600, Omkhar Arasaratnam wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> The 2.6.11.3 kernel with the 2.6.10 driver seems to fail with the same
> sym2 driver error - so I suppose it goes deeper than the driver itself.
>
Let's move that to linuxppc64-dev and drop the CC-lis
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 11:05 -0600, Omkhar Arasaratnam wrote:
2.6.10 seems to have a different kernel panic which I'm investigating
(could be a problem with my ramdisk as it happens in my linuxrc). So
long story short the 2.6.10 sym driver looks ok.
Can you tr
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 11:05 -0600, Omkhar Arasaratnam wrote:
2.6.10 seems to have a different kernel panic which I'm investigating
(could be a problem with my ramdisk as it happens in my linuxrc). So
long story short the 2.6.10 sym driver looks ok.
Can you tr
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 11:05 -0600, Omkhar Arasaratnam wrote:
2.6.10 seems to have a different kernel panic which I'm investigating
(could be a problem with my ramdisk as it happens in my linuxrc). So
long story short the 2.6.10 sym driver looks ok.
Can you tr
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 11:05 -0600, Omkhar Arasaratnam wrote:
> 2.6.10 seems to have a different kernel panic which I'm investigating
> (could be a problem with my ramdisk as it happens in my linuxrc). So
> long story short the 2.6.10 sym driver looks ok.
Can you try 2.6.11 with the 2.6.10 sym d
James Bottomley wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 12:17 +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
Heh, the devel version of sym2 (that isn't submitted yet because
it depends on a few changes to the SPI transport that James hasn't
integrated yet) would probably fix this as it doesn't call iounmap()
until the drive
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 12:17 +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Heh, the devel version of sym2 (that isn't submitted yet because
> it depends on a few changes to the SPI transport that James hasn't
> integrated yet) would probably fix this as it doesn't call iounmap()
> until the driver exits.
They're
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 04:59:43PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Ok, we have it working here on a similar machine with 2.6.11 and failing
> in a similar way with bk which is why I asked ;)
>
> The bk problem is found & fixed here tho. I'll send a patch later, it's
> a bug with ppc64 iounm
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 19:47 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Omkhar Arasaratnam wrote:
> >
> > I confirmed that this occurs with the 2.6.11 code straight from
> > kernel.org Here is an error from the bringup:
>
> So if 2.6.9 works, and 2.6.11 does not, can you check 2.6.10?
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 06:25:56PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >
> > BTW, Linus: Any chance you ever change something to version or
> > extraversion in bk just after a release ? I know I already ask and it
> > degenerated into a flamefe
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 06:25:56PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >
> > BTW, Linus: Any chance you ever change something to version or
> > extraversion in bk just after a release ? I know I already ask and it
> > degenerated into a flamefest, an
Linus Torvalds wrote:
There are certainly sym changes in there too since 2.6.9, let's see if
James or Willy have any suggestions. It might not be ppc64-specific.
Linus
I have tried with 2.6.10, this appears to fail as well. Unfortunately I
don't have console access right now s
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Omkhar Arasaratnam wrote:
>
> I confirmed that this occurs with the 2.6.11 code straight from
> kernel.org Here is an error from the bringup:
So if 2.6.9 works, and 2.6.11 does not, can you check 2.6.10? And perhaps
hunt it down even more, to a -rc release?
> sym0: No NVR
Omkhar Arasaratnam wrote:
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Are you sure it's plain 2.6.11 and not some bk clone of after 2.6.11 was
released ?
Ben - I am in the process of downloading a clean tarball from
kernel.org to be 100% certain.
I confirmed that this occurs with the 2.6.11 code straight fro
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Are you sure it's plain 2.6.11 and not some bk clone of after 2.6.11 was
released ?
Ben - I am in the process of downloading a clean tarball from kernel.org
to be 100% certain.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body o
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> BTW, Linus: Any chance you ever change something to version or
> extraversion in bk just after a release ? I know I already ask and it
> degenerated into a flamefest, and I don't know if that is specifically
> the case now, but I keep gettin
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 19:51 -0600, Omkhar Arasaratnam wrote:
> Seems with 2.6.11 the sym53c8xx kernel module incorrectly identifies the
> cache being misconfigured on a p630 (ppc64, POWER4+). 2.6.9 correctly
> brings up this adaptor as does AIX with absolutely no indication of a
> misconfigured cac
17 matches
Mail list logo
