Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: [Alsa drivers] Creatives X-Fi chip

2005-08-23 Thread Lee Revell
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 14:48 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > I don't mind if the fancy DSP algorithms and EAX is windows only Actually the emu10k1 DSP code to implement EAX 1.x, 2.x, and 3.x is known. Someone could easily implement it on Linux, it's just never happened. Lee - To unsubscribe fro

Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: [Alsa drivers] Creatives X-Fi chip

2005-08-23 Thread Lee Revell
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 21:41 +0100, Peter Zubaj wrote: > This is too expensive card to be only able use it as simple card. > My advice buy something else. > I don't think fight with creative can bring anything good to linux. > Leave Creative as is. There is plenty of other hardware from other > manu

Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: [Alsa drivers] Creatives X-Fi chip

2005-08-23 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 09:41:11PM +0100, Peter Zubaj wrote: > This is too expensive card to be only able use it as simple card. > My advice buy something else. > I don't think fight with creative can bring anything good to linux. > Leave Creative as is. There is plenty of other hardware from other

Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: [Alsa drivers] Creatives X-Fi chip

2005-08-23 Thread Peter Zubaj
This is too expensive card to be only able use it as simple card. My advice buy something else. I don't think fight with creative can bring anything good to linux. Leave Creative as is. There is plenty of other hardware from other manufacturer worth money. Peter Zubaj On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 17:54

Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: [Alsa drivers] Creatives X-Fi chip

2005-08-22 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Sat, 20 Aug 2005 03:08:07 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > > On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 08:48 +0200, Emmanuel Fleury wrote: > > So, there is no project about this yet > > No, not yet. The ALSA team has a contact at Creative, I guess the next > step is to ask them. Maybe James knows at best... Takashi

Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: [Alsa drivers] Creatives X-Fi chip

2005-08-22 Thread Lee Revell
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 21:38 +0100, James Courtier-Dutton wrote: > We are not going to get any support from Creative for the X-Fi chip. > We do not get support from Creative for any Creative chip that has a > DSP in it. Well, except for the emu10k1 driver that Creative wrote and released years ago

Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: [Alsa drivers] Creatives X-Fi chip

2005-08-22 Thread James Courtier-Dutton
Takashi Iwai wrote: At Sat, 20 Aug 2005 03:08:07 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 08:48 +0200, Emmanuel Fleury wrote: So, there is no project about this yet No, not yet. The ALSA team has a contact at Creative, I guess the next step is to ask them. Maybe James knows at bes

Re: [Alsa drivers] Creatives X-Fi chip

2005-08-20 Thread Lee Revell
On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 08:48 +0200, Emmanuel Fleury wrote: > So, there is no project about this yet No, not yet. The ALSA team has a contact at Creative, I guess the next step is to ask them. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message t

Re: [Alsa drivers] Creatives X-Fi chip

2005-08-19 Thread Emmanuel Fleury
Lee Revell wrote: > On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 11:55 +0200, Emmanuel Fleury wrote: > >>Hi all, >> >>I did try to look for Alsa drivers for the new X-Fi chip from Creatives >>(http://www.tomshardware.com/consumer/20050818/), but I didn't find any. >> >>I there something running around this chip ? Or no

Re: [Alsa drivers] Creatives X-Fi chip

2005-08-19 Thread Lee Revell
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 18:52 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > If this is the long awaited emu10k3, then there's a good chance we can > support it. But we'll need at the very least a hardware sample from > Creative. OK, it's the ca20k1 (!). So it's likely to be as different from the emu10k1 and emu10k1

Re: [Alsa drivers] Creatives X-Fi chip

2005-08-19 Thread Lee Revell
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 11:55 +0200, Emmanuel Fleury wrote: > Hi all, > > I did try to look for Alsa drivers for the new X-Fi chip from Creatives > (http://www.tomshardware.com/consumer/20050818/), but I didn't find any. > > I there something running around this chip ? Or no plan yet ? Are these e