Re: [ANNOUNCE] libtraceevent.git

2020-10-14 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 20:56:53 +0800 Zamir SUN wrote: > > > > So should I just add that one patch and tag it? > > > > That would be great, at least for Fedora packaging. I'm going with version 1.1.0 and not following the kernel versioning, as that would just add to the confusion. Here's the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] libtraceevent.git

2020-10-14 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 11:08:48 +0100 Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > Just a thought, if you see > https://repology.org/project/linux-tools/versions then you will notice > that libtracevent has been packaged by the distros with a version of > v5.x+, and I will have the same problem for Debian also. Do you

Re: [ANNOUNCE] libtraceevent.git

2020-10-14 Thread Zamir SUN
On 10/13/20 9:02 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 11:06:16 +0800 Zamir SUN wrote: On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 3:17 AM Steven Rostedt wrote: [ Removing the powertop mailing list because it's rejecting everything ] On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 11:41:20 -0700 Tony Jones wrote: On Mon

Re: [ANNOUNCE] libtraceevent.git

2020-10-14 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Hi Steve, On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 2:02 PM Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 11:06:16 +0800 > Zamir SUN wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 3:17 AM Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > So, for me, there is no more issue for Fedora packaging. > > > > So should I just add that one patch a

Re: [ANNOUNCE] libtraceevent.git

2020-10-13 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 11:06:16 +0800 Zamir SUN wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 3:17 AM Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > > [ Removing the powertop mailing list because it's rejecting everything ] > > > > On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 11:41:20 -0700 > > Tony Jones wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 1

Re: [ANNOUNCE] libtraceevent.git

2020-10-12 Thread Zamir SUN
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 3:17 AM Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > [ Removing the powertop mailing list because it's rejecting everything ] > > On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 11:41:20 -0700 > Tony Jones wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:19:50AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > Once it's shown that it w

Re: [ANNOUNCE] libtraceevent.git

2020-10-12 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Hi Steve, On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 8:17 PM Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > [ Removing the powertop mailing list because it's rejecting everything ] > > On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 11:41:20 -0700 > Tony Jones wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:19:50AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > Once it's show

Re: [ANNOUNCE] libtraceevent.git

2020-10-12 Thread Steven Rostedt
[ Removing the powertop mailing list because it's rejecting everything ] On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 11:41:20 -0700 Tony Jones wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:19:50AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > Once it's shown that it works for all the package maintainers, I will tag > > it which should c

Re: [ANNOUNCE] libtraceevent.git

2020-10-12 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 20:52:17 +0200 Jiri Olsa wrote: > > I presume some perf Makefile changes will be forthcoming to use it, > > rather than continuing to force build it out of TRACE_EVENT_DIR > > right, we need to detect it in features like any other library > and use it if it's found I need

Re: [ANNOUNCE] libtraceevent.git

2020-10-12 Thread Jiri Olsa
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:41:20AM -0700, Tony Jones wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:19:50AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > Once it's shown that it works for all the package maintainers, I will tag > > it which should create the tarballs automatically on the above link. > > Hi. > > It bu

Re: [ANNOUNCE] libtraceevent.git

2020-10-12 Thread Tony Jones
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:19:50AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > Once it's shown that it works for all the package maintainers, I will tag > it which should create the tarballs automatically on the above link. Hi. It builds fine for me after manually creating the tarball from git. Once there

Re: [ANNOUNCE] libtraceevent.git

2020-10-12 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 4:19 PM Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 12:12:08 +0200 > Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 01:07:50PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > I split out tools/lib/traceevent from the kernel tree using "git subtree", > > > which recreates all the comm

Re: [ANNOUNCE] libtraceevent.git

2020-10-12 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 12:12:08 +0200 Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 01:07:50PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > I split out tools/lib/traceevent from the kernel tree using "git subtree", > > which recreates all the commits of a directory and makes that directory a > > stand alone. I the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] libtraceevent.git

2020-10-12 Thread Jiri Olsa
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 06:19:14PM +0800, Zamir SUN wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 6:12 PM Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 01:07:50PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > I split out tools/lib/traceevent from the kernel tree using "git subtree", > > > which recreates all the commi

Re: [ANNOUNCE] libtraceevent.git

2020-10-12 Thread Zamir SUN
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 6:12 PM Jiri Olsa wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 01:07:50PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > I split out tools/lib/traceevent from the kernel tree using "git subtree", > > which recreates all the commits of a directory and makes that directory a > > stand alone. I then

Re: [ANNOUNCE] libtraceevent.git

2020-10-12 Thread Jiri Olsa
On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 01:07:50PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > I split out tools/lib/traceevent from the kernel tree using "git subtree", > which recreates all the commits of a directory and makes that directory a > stand alone. I then updated the Makefiles, and copied over some of the > header