Hi Thomas
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Tim Sander wrote:
> > handler. But normally the HR_TIMER is set. So we switched it off on this
> > very purpose. As we also have also PREEMPT_RT_FULL set the proposed
> > solution to allow only PREEMPT_RT_FULL with PREEMPT_RT_FULL set is not an
> > option for us.
Da
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 00:20 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Tim,
>
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Tim Sander wrote:
> > handler. But normally the HR_TIMER is set. So we switched it off on this
> > very
> > purpose. As we also have also PREEMPT_RT_FULL set the proposed solution to
> > allow only PREEMPT
Tim,
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Tim Sander wrote:
> handler. But normally the HR_TIMER is set. So we switched it off on this very
> purpose. As we also have also PREEMPT_RT_FULL set the proposed solution to
> allow only PREEMPT_RT_FULL with PREEMPT_RT_FULL set is not an option for us.
-ENOPARSE
--
To
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 16:22 +0200, Tim Sander wrote:
> As we also have also PREEMPT_RT_FULL set the proposed solution to
> allow only PREEMPT_RT_FULL with PREEMPT_RT_FULL set is not an option for us.
Then I think you have issues ;-)
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "u
Hi Sebastian
> > I just wanted to test this release but it fails to compile with the the
> > following error:
> >
> > kernel/hrtimer.c: In function '__hrtimer_start_range_ns':
> > kernel/hrtimer.c:1045:7: error: implicit declaration of function
> > 'hrtimer_rt_defer'
> > kernel/hrtimer.c: At top l
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 15:09 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 14:46 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 14:36 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > > > hrtime
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 15:09 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Well, if your application is driven by an external interrupt, then you
> do not need highres timers at all.
Fair point.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to ma
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 14:55 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 04/25/2013 02:36 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > hrtimer: fix hrtimer free zone build bug
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/hrtimer.c b/kernel/hrtimer.c
> > index 2328c04..31d57a2 100644
> > -
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 14:46 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 14:36 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > > hrtimer: fix hrtimer free zone build bug
> > >
> > > Perhaps the better solu
On 04/25/2013 02:36 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> hrtimer: fix hrtimer free zone build bug
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith
>
> diff --git a/kernel/hrtimer.c b/kernel/hrtimer.c
> index 2328c04..31d57a2 100644
> --- a/kernel/hrtimer.c
> +++ b/kernel/hrtimer.c
> @@ -1036,7 +1036,7 @@ int __hrtimer_
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 14:48 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> > Perhaps the better solution is to select HIGH_RES_TIMERS when
> > PREEMPT_RT_FULL is selected?
>
> If they have support, most definitely. I got the impression lots of ARM
> boxen are impoverished.. why else would they not have it al
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 14:46 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 14:36 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > hrtimer: fix hrtimer free zone build bug
> >
> > Perhaps the better solution is to select HIGH_RES_TIMERS when
> > PREEMPT_RT_FU
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 08:43 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 14:36 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 14:32 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > On 04/25/2013 01:14 PM, Tim Sander wrote:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > I just wanted to test this relea
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 14:36 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > hrtimer: fix hrtimer free zone build bug
>
> Perhaps the better solution is to select HIGH_RES_TIMERS when
> PREEMPT_RT_FULL is selected?
No, why ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 14:36 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 14:32 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > On 04/25/2013 01:14 PM, Tim Sander wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I just wanted to test this release but it fails to compile with the the
> > > following error:
> > >
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 13:14 +0200, Tim Sander wrote:
> Hi
>
> I just wanted to test this release but it fails to compile with the the
> following error:
>
> kernel/hrtimer.c: In function '__hrtimer_start_range_ns':
> kernel/hrtimer.c:1045:7: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'hrtimer_r
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 14:32 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 04/25/2013 01:14 PM, Tim Sander wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I just wanted to test this release but it fails to compile with the the
> > following error:
> >
> > kernel/hrtimer.c: In function '__hrtimer_start_range_ns':
> > kern
On 04/25/2013 01:14 PM, Tim Sander wrote:
> Hi
>
> I just wanted to test this release but it fails to compile with the the
> following error:
>
> kernel/hrtimer.c: In function '__hrtimer_start_range_ns':
> kernel/hrtimer.c:1045:7: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'hrtimer_rt_defer'
>
Hi
I just wanted to test this release but it fails to compile with the the
following error:
kernel/hrtimer.c: In function '__hrtimer_start_range_ns':
kernel/hrtimer.c:1045:7: error: implicit declaration of function
'hrtimer_rt_defer'
kernel/hrtimer.c: At top level:
kernel/hrtimer.c:1416:12: er
19 matches
Mail list logo
