Re: [2.6 patch] make secmark_tg_destroy() static

2008-02-13 Thread David Miller
From: James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:41:19 +1100 (EST) > On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Paul Moore wrote: > > > On Wednesday 13 February 2008 4:29:40 pm Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > This patch makes the needlessly global secmark_tg_destroy() static. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Adrian

Re: [2.6 patch] make secmark_tg_destroy() static

2008-02-13 Thread David Miller
From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:29:40 +0200 > This patch makes the needlessly global secmark_tg_destroy() static. > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of

Re: [2.6 patch] make secmark_tg_destroy() static

2008-02-13 Thread James Morris
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Paul Moore wrote: > On Wednesday 13 February 2008 4:29:40 pm Adrian Bunk wrote: > > This patch makes the needlessly global secmark_tg_destroy() static. > > > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Thanks for catching this. > > Acked-by: Paul Moore <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [2.6 patch] make secmark_tg_destroy() static

2008-02-13 Thread Paul Moore
On Wednesday 13 February 2008 4:29:40 pm Adrian Bunk wrote: > This patch makes the needlessly global secmark_tg_destroy() static. > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thanks for catching this. Acked-by: Paul Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > df66d8d74309b41298ae011532fd284aad3ed2ba