Re: [2.6 patch] #if 0 aoedev_isbusy()

2008-02-13 Thread Ed L. Cashin
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:05:37AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 11:03:35PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > > > On Feb 13 2008 23:30, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > > >This patch #if 0's the no longer used aoedev_isbusy(). > > > > Why not just remove it? (It can be resurrected

Re: [2.6 patch] #if 0 aoedev_isbusy()

2008-02-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 11:03:35PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Feb 13 2008 23:30, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > >This patch #if 0's the no longer used aoedev_isbusy(). > > Why not just remove it? (It can be resurrected from earlier > revisions should it be needed again.) I've switched to doin

Re: [2.6 patch] #if 0 aoedev_isbusy()

2008-02-13 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Feb 13 2008 23:30, Adrian Bunk wrote: > >This patch #if 0's the no longer used aoedev_isbusy(). Why not just remove it? (It can be resurrected from earlier revisions should it be needed again.) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message