On 5 January 2015 at 21:03, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 2:21 AM, Jay Foad wrote:
>> Sorry for replying to this old email...
>>
>>> commit d7824370e26325c881b665350ce64fb0a4fde24a upstream
>
> Heh. From august 2010. That's 4+ years ago.. How come it was noticed
> only now?
*Not
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> IOW, *maybe* a patch like this. TOTALLY UNTESTED! I may have missed
> something, and this may be complete crap.
It does indeed seem to work.
But see my other email about this effectively making the stack limit
one page smaller. I'm not en
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> Yup, your analysis sounds correct. My completely untested gut feel is
> that the problem is that we don't actually return the error from the
> expand_stack() call, so then do_anonymous_page() will allow the extra
> guard-page access.
>
> I
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 2:21 AM, Jay Foad wrote:
> Sorry for replying to this old email...
>
>> commit d7824370e26325c881b665350ce64fb0a4fde24a upstream
Heh. From august 2010. That's 4+ years ago.. How come it was noticed
only now? You guys are running excessively old kernels, methinks.
> Address
Sorry for replying to this old email...
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 13:30 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> 2.6.35-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
>
> --
>
> From: Linus Torvalds
>
> commit d7824370e26325c881b665350ce64fb0a4fde24a upstream.
>
> This commit m
5 matches
Mail list logo
