Hi David.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 12:00:04PM +1100, David Chinner ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 06:03:38PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > DST passed all FS tests in LTP with XFS (modulo MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low bug:
> > [ 8398.605691] BUG: MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low!
> > [ 83
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 06:03:38PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> DST passed all FS tests in LTP with XFS (modulo MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low bug:
> [ 8398.605691] BUG: MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low!
> [ 8398.609641] turning off the locking correctness validator.
Evgeniy, can you please start reporting thes
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 04:56:26PM +, Christoph Hellwig ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> > > * fixed bug with XFS metadata update (it can provide slab pages to the
> > > DST, so it is not allowed to transfer them using ->sendpage())
>
> xfs hasn't been doing that anymore for quite a whil
> > * fixed bug with XFS metadata update (it can provide slab pages to the
> > DST, so it is not allowed to transfer them using ->sendpage())
xfs hasn't been doing that anymore for quite a while. Block drivers
don't need hacks for it anymore, epsecially as it's not reliably
detectable.
Hi Mike.
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 10:25:29AM -0500, Mike Snitzer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Thanks for your continued work on DST. I'd like to know if you've
> thought further about how synchronous mirroring would be best
> implemented with DST.
>
> You shared you views some time ago via comme
On Dec 4, 2007 9:37 AM, Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Distributed storage.
>
> I'm pleased to announce the 10'th release of the distributed
> storage subsystem (DST). This is a maintenance release and includes
> bug fixes and simple feature extensions only.
>
> DST allows to form
6 matches
Mail list logo
