On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 09:50:34AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I have the ARRAY_SIZE change queued for 2.6.22.
>
> It looks like the UML change needs to be folded into the same changeset to
> avoid build breaks?
Yes, that would be great.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:06:40 -0400 Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These are post-2.6.21 material, except that if the new definition of
> ARRAY_SIZE goes to Linus, patch 1 in this series should go as well.
I have the ARRAY_SIZE change queued for 2.6.22.
It looks like the UML change needs
2 matches
Mail list logo
