Re: *grin* Windows 2000 & HPC: Scalable, Inexpensive

2001-02-20 Thread Dr. Kelsey Hudson
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Mike Harrold wrote: > > The sad thing is, 3/4 of the page is an outright lie. It isn't > a first, W2k is not the de facto standard OS, and the TCO is > significantly higher than any cluster running Linux. No shit, not to mention that Linux is going to be faster and better su

Re: *grin* Windows 2000 & HPC: Scalable, Inexpensive

2001-02-15 Thread Gnea
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 09:21:24AM -0500, Mike Harrold wrote: > > > > At 9:10 am + 14/2/2001, David Howells wrote: > > >How this for a laugh: > > > > > >http://www.microsoft.com/WINDOWS2000/hpc/indstand.asp > > > > > > > Can anybody say "Beowulf cluster"? I bet you need a W2K license for ev

Re: *grin* Windows 2000 & HPC: Scalable, Inexpensive

2001-02-14 Thread Mike Harrold
> > At 9:10 am + 14/2/2001, David Howells wrote: > >How this for a laugh: > > > >http://www.microsoft.com/WINDOWS2000/hpc/indstand.asp > > > > Can anybody say "Beowulf cluster"? I bet you need a W2K license for every > box you hook up, too. The sad thing is, 3/4 of the page is an outright