On 09/08/2014 10:55 AM, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
>> Today, there's good chance there's linux somewhere in your car. (Dashboard,
>> entertainment system). People like to keep cars from 1910 working, and I
>> suspect
>> that is not going to change.
>>
>> So yes, in 2038 people will be running 32bi
> Today, there's good chance there's linux somewhere in your car. (Dashboard,
> entertainment system). People like to keep cars from 1910 working, and I
> suspect
> that is not going to change.
>
> So yes, in 2038 people will be running 32bit linux.
>
> Whether there will be people putting 32bit
Hi!
> There was also some pre-discussion before the sessions started around
> why we don't just change time_t to be unsigned. From the kernel's
> point of view this would be mostly fine, since dates before 1970 are
> not considered valid for any internal uses (with the exception of some
> filesyst
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 5:08 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> So what I’d like to cover in this mail, are some discussion starters around
> ABI modifications that I think we should discuss at Kernel Summit, in order
> to make sure we have a clear path forward, as what we decide for the ABI
> modifications
On Tuesday 12 August 2014 17:08:53 John Stultz wrote:
> Next week at Kernel Summit, I'm hoping to have a discussion on 2038 during
> one of the unconference slots, so I wanted to send out some background
> information about the various proposed approaches (as well as send this out
> for wider inpu
5 matches
Mail list logo
