On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 22:09 -0800, Matt Mackall wrote:
>
> It's something in this batch. Which is good, as I'd be a bit
> disappointed if the "vt leakage" were somehow attributable to the fb
> layer. More bisection after dinner.
Regarding the radeonfb reboot problem, can you try this patch on
to
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 01:33:39PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Matt Mackall wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 08:07:11PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Next suspects would be:
> > > >
> > > > +cleanup-v
On Friday 21 January 2005 11:57, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 04:01:23PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I do a reboot(8) from inside X, I get switched to vt 0, but the
> shutdown messages come out on vt 7, where X was running. As I'm
>
On Friday 21 January 2005 20:33, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 08:07:11PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Next suspects would be:
> > > >
> > > > +cleanup-vc-array-access.patch
>
Hi,
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 08:07:11PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Next suspects would be:
> > >
> > > +cleanup-vc-array-access.patch
> > > +remove-console_macrosh.patch
> > > +merge-vt_struct-
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 08:07:11PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Next suspects would be:
> >
> > +cleanup-vc-array-access.patch
> > +remove-console_macrosh.patch
> > +merge-vt_struct-into-vc_data.patch
> >
> >
>
> Make that:
>
> +cleanup-vc-a
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Next suspects would be:
>
> +cleanup-vc-array-access.patch
> +remove-console_macrosh.patch
> +merge-vt_struct-into-vc_data.patch
>
>
Make that:
+cleanup-vc-array-access.patch
+remove-console_macrosh.patch
+merge-vt_struct-into-vc_data.patch
+vgac
Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Here are the symptoms:
>
> mm2: corruption of Tux logo at boot, corruption of display at
> powerdown, lockup and LCD blooming on next warm boot when radeonfb
> starts. Ben suggested I try some radeonfb options, but none seemed to
> have any effect.
>
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 04:01:23PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Which radeon driver? CONFIG_FB_RADEON_OLD or CONFIG_FB_RADEON?
> >
> > FB_RADEON.
>
> Ah, OK. Likely culprits are
>
> radeonfb-massive-update-of-pm-code.patch
> radeonfb-build-fix.
> > > > I'm seeing radeonfb on my ThinkPad T30 go weird on reboot (lots of
> > > > horizontal lines) and require powercycling to fix. Worked fine with
> > > > 2.6.10.
> > >
> > > Which radeon driver? CONFIG_FB_RADEON_OLD or CONFIG_FB_RADEON?
> >
> > FB_RADEON.
> >
> > > (cc Ben, who is the lik
On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 15:48 -0800, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 03:39:21PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm seeing radeonfb on my ThinkPad T30 go weird on reboot (lots of
> > > horizontal lines) and require powercycling to fix.
On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 15:39 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'm seeing radeonfb on my ThinkPad T30 go weird on reboot (lots of
> > horizontal lines) and require powercycling to fix. Worked fine with 2.6.10.
>
> Which radeon driver? CONFIG_FB_RADEON_OLD
Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Which radeon driver? CONFIG_FB_RADEON_OLD or CONFIG_FB_RADEON?
>
> FB_RADEON.
Ah, OK. Likely culprits are
radeonfb-massive-update-of-pm-code.patch
radeonfb-build-fix.patch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 03:39:21PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'm seeing radeonfb on my ThinkPad T30 go weird on reboot (lots of
> > horizontal lines) and require powercycling to fix. Worked fine with 2.6.10.
>
> Which radeon driver? CONFIG_FB_RAD
Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm seeing radeonfb on my ThinkPad T30 go weird on reboot (lots of
> horizontal lines) and require powercycling to fix. Worked fine with 2.6.10.
Which radeon driver? CONFIG_FB_RADEON_OLD or CONFIG_FB_RADEON?
(cc Ben, who is the likely cuprit ;)
Which -
I'm seeing radeonfb on my ThinkPad T30 go weird on reboot (lots of
horizontal lines) and require powercycling to fix. Worked fine with 2.6.10.
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
16 matches
Mail list logo