Re: RSDL development plans

2007-03-16 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 00:59 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote: > On Saturday 17 March 2007 00:42, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 23:25 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote: > > > The good news is that in order to stay sane I've found ways of optimising > > > my computing position and could work for sho

Re: RSDL development plans

2007-03-16 Thread Con Kolivas
On Saturday 17 March 2007 00:42, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 23:25 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote: > > The good news is that in order to stay sane I've found ways of optimising > > my computing position and could work for short stints on the rsdl code. > > So I'll be releasing a new ver

Re: RSDL development plans

2007-03-16 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 23:25 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote: > The good news is that in order to stay sane I've found ways of optimising my > computing position and could work for short stints on the rsdl code. So I'll > be releasing a new version shortly. Can you please make an incremental diff as we

Re: RSDL development plans

2007-03-16 Thread Con Kolivas
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 10:08, Con Kolivas wrote: > However, I must inform people that I have to arrest the RSDL development > for at least this week. I have a new and fairly serious neck problem that > is being exacerbated badly by sitting in front of the computer for any > extended period. Th

RSDL development plans

2007-03-13 Thread Con Kolivas
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 07:58, Con Kolivas wrote: > On Wednesday 14 March 2007 03:03, Con Kolivas wrote: > > On Wednesday 14 March 2007 02:31, Con Kolivas wrote: > > > On Monday 12 March 2007 22:26, Al Boldi wrote: > > > > I think, it should be possible to spread this max expiration latency > >