On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Jan Kara wrote:
>
> My fix for this problem is already sitting in Andrew's patch queue
> (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/11/79). Rich's patch still has a problem - you
> cannot call udf_discard_prealloc() from drop_inode() because it is called
> under inode_lock and thus you c
On Thu 14-06-07 15:12:58, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Rich Coe wrote:
> >
> > I've updated the patch below to use drop_inode rather than put_inode.
> >
> > drop_inode is only called when the last iput() reference to the inode is
> > released, where put_inode is called for ev
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Rich Coe wrote:
>
> I've updated the patch below to use drop_inode rather than put_inode.
>
> drop_inode is only called when the last iput() reference to the inode is
> released, where put_inode is called for every iput().
Patch looks fine, but this late in the -rc series,
I've updated the patch below to use drop_inode rather than put_inode.
drop_inode is only called when the last iput() reference to the inode is
released, where put_inode is called for every iput().
Rich
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:48:03 -0500
Rich Coe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> This
4 matches
Mail list logo
