Re: RFC: Harmonised parameter passing

2005-03-08 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 16:47:47 +0100, Henk Vergonet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One question remains though, how do you handle the initialization of > multiple instances of an inbound driver? > > mcd0.io=0x340 mcd1.io=0x350 > I think the most common practice is to specify a list of addresses: mcd.

Re: RFC: Harmonised parameter passing

2005-03-08 Thread Henk Vergonet
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 10:14:32AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 15:59:23 +0100, Henk Vergonet > > Could we extend this method where we use the same methodology for inbound > > drivers? (Currently a lot of drivers use their own parameter parsing code > > when it comes to pass

Re: RFC: Harmonised parameter passing

2005-03-08 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 15:59:23 +0100, Henk Vergonet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > The current method of parameter passing to drivers build as a module is > extremely usefull. > Modules don't have to write there own parsing code, there's a nice macro that > can be used to document specific

RFC: Harmonised parameter passing

2005-03-08 Thread Henk Vergonet
Hi, The current method of parameter passing to drivers build as a module is extremely usefull. Modules don't have to write there own parsing code, there's a nice macro that can be used to document specifics of the parameter and so on. Could we extend this method where we use the same methodolo