On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:09:04AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2016, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > This is a straightforward speedup on Ivy Bridge and newer, IIRC.
> > (I tested on Skylake. INVPCID is not available on Sandy Bridge.
> > I don't have Ivy Bridge, Haswell or Broadwell
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> This is a straightforward speedup on Ivy Bridge and newer, IIRC.
> (I tested on Skylake. INVPCID is not available on Sandy Bridge.
> I don't have Ivy Bridge, Haswell or Broadwell to test on, so I
> could be wrong as to when the feature was introduced.)
..@kernel.org;
> k...@vger.kernel.org; io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; LKML
> Subject: Re: several messages
>
> On 2014/11/11 2:15, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Feng Wu wrote:
> >
> >> VT-d Posted-Interrupts is an enhancement to CPU side Posted-
On 2014/11/11 2:15, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Feng Wu wrote:
>
>> VT-d Posted-Interrupts is an enhancement to CPU side Posted-Interrupt.
>> With VT-d Posted-Interrupts enabled, external interrupts from
>> direct-assigned devices can be delivered to guests without VMM
>> interve
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Feng Wu wrote:
> VT-d Posted-Interrupts is an enhancement to CPU side Posted-Interrupt.
> With VT-d Posted-Interrupts enabled, external interrupts from
> direct-assigned devices can be delivered to guests without VMM
> intervention when guest is running in non-root mode.
Can
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 23:58 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> I think, we only want 1, right? And the latter seems to be more generic /
> platform independent? And as a side-effect, powermac would have to migrate
> to generic rtc:-)
Can we migrate all of powerpc to genrtc? But yes, I agree.
On Thursday 22 February 2007 2:58 pm, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>
> I think, we only want 1, right? And the latter seems to be more generic /
> platform independent? And as a side-effect, powermac would have to migrate
> to generic rtc:-)
I'd certainly think that restoring the system clock s
of the following 2 patches:
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007, Johannes Berg wrote:
> This patch removes the time suspend/restore code that was done through
> a PMU notifier in arch/platforms/powermac/time.c.
>
> Instead, we introduce arch/powerpc/sysdev/timer.c which creates a sys
> device and handles time of
8 matches
Mail list logo
