>-Original Message-
>From: stephane eranian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2008 12:16
>I looked at your code. My understanding is that it abstracts the BTS
>so that higher
>level code does not have to know the intricacies of the implementation
>especially
>given t
Markus,
I looked at your code. My understanding is that it abstracts the BTS
so that higher
level code does not have to know the intricacies of the implementation
especially
given that the changed the DS_AREA structure a lot between P4 and Core 2.
The code does not cover PEBS though. In the case
Markus,
On Jan 30, 2008 1:52 PM, Metzger, Markus T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >From: stephane eranian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Mittwoch, 30. Januar 2008 12:01
>
> >You can get information about the perfmon2 project at:
> >http://perfmon2.sf.net
>
> I downloaded your patch for 2.6.23 an
>From: stephane eranian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Mittwoch, 30. Januar 2008 12:01
>You can get information about the perfmon2 project at:
>http://perfmon2.sf.net
I downloaded your patch for 2.6.23 and cloned your git repository.
>From a first glance, it looks like there is indeed a lot
Hello Markus,
On Jan 30, 2008 11:32 AM, Metzger, Markus T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >From: Roland McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Mittwoch, 30. Januar 2008 08:26
> >To: Metzger, Markus T
>
> >I think this work has a great deal of overlap with the
> >perfmon2 project.
> >There are two
>From: Roland McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Mittwoch, 30. Januar 2008 08:26
>To: Metzger, Markus T
>I think this work has a great deal of overlap with the
>perfmon2 project.
>There are two facets that overlap, which together are the
>whole BTS feature.
>
>The same x86 "debug store" h
Sorry I did not get more into this discussion earlier. I still have not
read through all of the email threads. But I have looked over the current
version of your code now in -mm.
I think this work has a great deal of overlap with the perfmon2 project.
There are two facets that overlap, which tog
>From: Andi Kleen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Freitag, 7. Dezember 2007 14:04
>With Out-of-order CPUs exact global metrics are pretty difficult.
>At which point of the instruction execution would you measure?
All I want to do is order the execution chunks of different
threads. Taking two
On Friday 07 December 2007 13:01:28 Metzger, Markus T wrote:
> >From: Andi Kleen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Freitag, 7. Dezember 2007 12:18
>
> >> I would like to settle the discussion and find an interface that
> >> everybody can agree to, so I can implement that interface and we can
> >
>From: Andi Kleen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Freitag, 7. Dezember 2007 12:18
>> I would like to settle the discussion and find an interface that
>> everybody can agree to, so I can implement that interface and we can
>> move forward with the patch.
>
>The most efficient interface would be z
On Friday 07 December 2007 10:11:04 Metzger, Markus T wrote:
> Roland, Andi,
>
> I would like to discuss the ptrace user interface for the BTS extension.
> In previous emails,
> Andi suggested a stream-like interface, but is also OK with an
> array-like interface (as far as I understood).
> Rolan
11 matches
Mail list logo
