Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound-asoc tree with the drm-misc tree

2017-10-18 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 02:33:37PM +, Deucher, Alexander wrote: Please fix your mail client to word wrap within paragraphs at something substantially less than 80 columns. Doing this makes your messages much easier to read and reply to. > Your conflict change affectively reverted 1e444864833

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound-asoc tree with the drm-misc tree

2017-10-18 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 02:30:50PM +, Deucher, Alexander wrote: > The patch below effectively reverts 1e4448648333a. If you drop the patch > below, you should be fine. As I said in my followup mail I've dropped all these patches due to build failures, please resend both the pull request and

RE: linux-next: manual merge of the sound-asoc tree with the drm-misc tree

2017-10-18 Thread Deucher, Alexander
g List; alsa-devel@alsa- > project.org > Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound-asoc tree with the drm- > misc tree > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:57:33AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > >

RE: linux-next: manual merge of the sound-asoc tree with the drm-misc tree

2017-10-18 Thread Deucher, Alexander
> -Original Message- > From: Mark Brown [mailto:broo...@kernel.org] > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 5:58 AM > To: Deucher, Alexander; Mukunda, Vijendar; Zhu, Rex; Daniel Vetter; Intel > Graphics; DRI; Liam Girdwood > Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List; Linux Kernel Mailing List > Subject: linu

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound-asoc tree with the drm-misc tree

2017-10-18 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:57:33AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > is submitted for mergi