Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the char-misc tree

2015-08-06 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 04:35:52PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: > > include/linux/kexec.h > > between commit: > > 2b94ed245861 ("kexec: define kexec_in_progress in !CONFIG_KEXEC case") > > from the char

RE: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the char-misc tree

2014-01-16 Thread Ian Munsie
Excerpts from Winkler, Tomas's message of 2014-01-16 09:36:40 +1100: > I think the issue was fixed and also then number of consecutive resets were > limited to 3 so you should > not see this issue anymore in the next release, your patch just conflicted > with these fixes. > Still need to provid

RE: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the char-misc tree

2014-01-15 Thread Winkler, Tomas
E: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the char- > misc tree > > Excerpts from Winkler, Tomas's message of 2014-01-14 19:31:26 +1100: > > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in > > > drivers/misc/mei/init.c betwe

RE: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the char-misc tree

2014-01-14 Thread Ian Munsie
Excerpts from Winkler, Tomas's message of 2014-01-14 19:31:26 +1100: > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in > > drivers/misc/mei/init.c between commit 33ec08263147 ("mei: revamp mei > > reset state machine") from the char-misc tree and commit dd045dab2999 > > ("driv

RE: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the char-misc tree

2014-01-14 Thread Winkler, Tomas
> -Original Message- > From: Stephen Rothwell [mailto:s...@canb.auug.org.au] > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 06:51 > To: Andrew Morton; Greg KH; Arnd Bergmann > Cc: linux-n...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Ian Munsie; > Winkler, Tomas > Subject: linux-next: manual merge